Review



svm sub-decoder  (MathWorks Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol MathWorks Inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    MathWorks Inc svm sub-decoder
    Svm Sub Decoder, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/svm sub-decoder/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    svm sub-decoder - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    90
    MathWorks Inc svm sub-decoder
    Svm Sub Decoder, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/svm sub-decoder/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    svm sub-decoder - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MathWorks Inc svm decoding
    Svm Decoding, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/svm decoding/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    svm decoding - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MathWorks Inc svm decoder with a linear kernel fitcsvm
    Svm Decoder With A Linear Kernel Fitcsvm, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/svm decoder with a linear kernel fitcsvm/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    svm decoder with a linear kernel fitcsvm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MathWorks Inc svm decoder
    a , b Example neurons maintaining selective responses to the reward- and no-reward-associated mouse. c Changes in d’ values of each neuron in an example mouse. d The proportions of stable (mean ± SEM, two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.014 and 0.040 for the reward and no-reward category) and reversed neurons (two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.40 and 0.47 for the reward and no-reward category, n = 12 mice). Dashed lines indicate the chance level. No difference between the proportions of stable neurons in the reward and no-reward categories (two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.89). e Neural population activity on day 1 predicted the identity of stimulus mice from population activity on day 2 for an example pair of sessions. Upper bars indicate the period of significant decoding (Cluster-based permutation test, two-sided, p < 0.05). f Decoding accuracies of individual mice decreased as the time interval between sessions increased. The <t>SVM</t> decoders trained <t>with</t> <t>neuronal</t> activity patterns on day 1 were tested on each trial of day n (2 to 5). For the zero distance, within-day decoding accuracy on day 1 was calculated. Across-day decoding accuracies were maintained higher than chance (two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test; reward category: p = 3.8 × 10 −6 , 1.6 × 10 −5 , 5.1 × 10 −4 for distance 1, 2, 3, p = 3.7 × 10 −5 for 0 vs. 1; no-reward category: p = 6.0 × 10 −7 , 6.4 × 10 −5 , 9.1 × 10 −4 for distance 1, 2, 3, p = 2.2 × 10 −9 for 0 vs. 1). Across-day decoding accuracies were similar between reward and no-reward category (two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.71, n = 12 mice). Thin lines for each mouse. Thick lines for mean. g Within-session decoding accuracies of the identity of stimulus mice were stably high ( n = 12 mice). Dashed lines in f and g represent decoding accuracies obtained from shuffled data. O, window opening. R, start of response window. C, window closing. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 , ** * p < 0.001, n.s., not significant. n.d., not determined. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Svm Decoder, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/svm decoder/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    svm decoder - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a , b Example neurons maintaining selective responses to the reward- and no-reward-associated mouse. c Changes in d’ values of each neuron in an example mouse. d The proportions of stable (mean ± SEM, two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.014 and 0.040 for the reward and no-reward category) and reversed neurons (two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.40 and 0.47 for the reward and no-reward category, n = 12 mice). Dashed lines indicate the chance level. No difference between the proportions of stable neurons in the reward and no-reward categories (two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.89). e Neural population activity on day 1 predicted the identity of stimulus mice from population activity on day 2 for an example pair of sessions. Upper bars indicate the period of significant decoding (Cluster-based permutation test, two-sided, p < 0.05). f Decoding accuracies of individual mice decreased as the time interval between sessions increased. The SVM decoders trained with neuronal activity patterns on day 1 were tested on each trial of day n (2 to 5). For the zero distance, within-day decoding accuracy on day 1 was calculated. Across-day decoding accuracies were maintained higher than chance (two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test; reward category: p = 3.8 × 10 −6 , 1.6 × 10 −5 , 5.1 × 10 −4 for distance 1, 2, 3, p = 3.7 × 10 −5 for 0 vs. 1; no-reward category: p = 6.0 × 10 −7 , 6.4 × 10 −5 , 9.1 × 10 −4 for distance 1, 2, 3, p = 2.2 × 10 −9 for 0 vs. 1). Across-day decoding accuracies were similar between reward and no-reward category (two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.71, n = 12 mice). Thin lines for each mouse. Thick lines for mean. g Within-session decoding accuracies of the identity of stimulus mice were stably high ( n = 12 mice). Dashed lines in f and g represent decoding accuracies obtained from shuffled data. O, window opening. R, start of response window. C, window closing. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 , ** * p < 0.001, n.s., not significant. n.d., not determined. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Dynamic and stable hippocampal representations of social identity and reward expectation support associative social memory in male mice

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38338-3

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a , b Example neurons maintaining selective responses to the reward- and no-reward-associated mouse. c Changes in d’ values of each neuron in an example mouse. d The proportions of stable (mean ± SEM, two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.014 and 0.040 for the reward and no-reward category) and reversed neurons (two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.40 and 0.47 for the reward and no-reward category, n = 12 mice). Dashed lines indicate the chance level. No difference between the proportions of stable neurons in the reward and no-reward categories (two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.89). e Neural population activity on day 1 predicted the identity of stimulus mice from population activity on day 2 for an example pair of sessions. Upper bars indicate the period of significant decoding (Cluster-based permutation test, two-sided, p < 0.05). f Decoding accuracies of individual mice decreased as the time interval between sessions increased. The SVM decoders trained with neuronal activity patterns on day 1 were tested on each trial of day n (2 to 5). For the zero distance, within-day decoding accuracy on day 1 was calculated. Across-day decoding accuracies were maintained higher than chance (two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test; reward category: p = 3.8 × 10 −6 , 1.6 × 10 −5 , 5.1 × 10 −4 for distance 1, 2, 3, p = 3.7 × 10 −5 for 0 vs. 1; no-reward category: p = 6.0 × 10 −7 , 6.4 × 10 −5 , 9.1 × 10 −4 for distance 1, 2, 3, p = 2.2 × 10 −9 for 0 vs. 1). Across-day decoding accuracies were similar between reward and no-reward category (two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.71, n = 12 mice). Thin lines for each mouse. Thick lines for mean. g Within-session decoding accuracies of the identity of stimulus mice were stably high ( n = 12 mice). Dashed lines in f and g represent decoding accuracies obtained from shuffled data. O, window opening. R, start of response window. C, window closing. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 , ** * p < 0.001, n.s., not significant. n.d., not determined. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Article Snippet: To test if neuronal population activity patterns provide task-relevant information, we used an SVM decoder with a linear kernel (fitcsvm in MATLAB with the standardization option) to classify neuronal activity patterns into either reward or no-reward trial categories (Figs. j–l and ).

    Techniques: Activity Assay, Stable Transfection